and discuss several applications. I would like to add one more important result to it: the Stone–Weierstrass theorem.
Corollary. Let be a continuous function. Then
Proof. Since , we have:
Let be two topological rings and let be a continuous ring homomorphism with , the center of . Then becomes a topological -algebra. The scalar multiplication is continuous because it is a composition of continuous maps:
Proposition. Let be a subalgebra of , then is also a subalgebra.
Proof. By the corollary above,
So is closed under addition. Similarly for multiplication. For scalar multiplication , we have
The same argument works for topological groups.
Now consider , where is a compact space. Let be a subalgebra (possibly a ring without identity). We want to know when
(1) Vanishing at a point
If , where is defined by , then is not dense.
Why? Since is continuous, its kernel is closed. So
If is not contained in the kernel of any evaluation map, we say is a non-vanishing subalgebra.
(2) Failure to separate points
If , then again is not dense.
Since is continuous, its kernel is closed:
If is not contained in any such kernel, we say separates points.
Lemma (Weierstrass Approximation Theorem). The ring of polynomial functions on is dense in . That is, for all and any , there exists a polynomial such that
Corollary. For any and any , there exists a polynomial such that and
Proof. Define
By the Weierstrass theorem, there exists a polynomial such that
Let . Then
Proposition. Let be a non-vanishing subalgebra of where is compact. Then .
Proof. For each , there exists such that . Let
Then is an open cover. By compactness, there is a finite subcover . Let
then on . Since is continuous on a compact space, there exist constants such that
By the previous corollary, there exists a polynomial such that
Let , then
and since is a polynomial and , we have . So .
Proposition. Let be a unital closed subalgebra of where is compact. Then:
.
and .
Proof.
(1) Since is bounded, there exists a sequence of polynomials on converging uniformly to . Then uniformly.
(2) Note that
Stone–Weierstrass Theorem
Let be a compact Hausdorff space. If a subalgebra is non-vanishing and separates points, then is dense in .
By previous propositions, this is equivalent to: if is a unital algebra that separates points, then .
Proof.
Let . For any , we need to find such that:
Pick distinct . Since separates points, there exists such that . Define
Then , with
Let
This is open. Fixing , the collection is an open cover of . By compactness, there exists a finite subcover:
Define
Then
Now define the sets
which form another open cover. Compactness gives a finite subcover:
Define
Then
So
Example. Let consider the family of , where is polynomial on , easy to see that it is a untial algebra and separate points, hence it is dense in . Hence, if then . Since is a continuous function on .
No comments:
Post a Comment