Blog Archive

Wednesday, November 20, 2024

A New Proof of King’s Rule Using Involution

The King's Rule is

(1)∫abf(x)dx=∫abf(a+b−x)dx.

The traditional proof of King’s Rule is not understandable, purely counting and does not reval anything.

Now let us use involution to give a new proof.

Lemma Consider an R-module M with Char(R)≠2, and ∗∈AutR−Mod(M) satisfying ∗2=IdM. We have

(2)M≅Odd⊕Even,

where Odd=Ker(∗+IdM) and Even=Ker(∗−IdM).

Proof. Firstly, let us prove that Odd+Even=M. For any x∈M, we have:

(3)x=x+x∗2+x−x∗2.

Secondly, let us prove that Odd∩Even=0. For x∈Odd∩Even, we have x∗=x (from Even) and x∗=−x (from Odd). Thus:

(4)x=x∗=−x⟹2x=0.

Since Char(R)≠2, 2 is a unit, so x=0. ◻

Remark. The map E(x)=x+x∗2:M→Even is the projection onto Even since for x∈Even, E(x)=x. The kernel of E is obviously Odd:=Ker(∗+IdM). Similarly, O(x)=x−x∗2:M→Odd. When M is an inner product space, Odd and Even will be orthogonal to each other.

Lemma. Let T:M→N be a module homomorphism with Odd⊆Ker(T). Then Tx=Tx∗ for all x∈M.

Proof.

(5)Tx=Tx∗⟺T(x−x∗)=0.◻

Let us consider an involution on C[a,b], defined as:

(6)f∗(x)=f(a+b−x).

When a=−b, this becomes f∗(x)=f(−x). Let T:=∫ab(−)dx. Then it is easy to see that Odd⊆Ker(T), since the odd part here consists of functions that are odd about the center a+b2.

Hence we have:

(7)∫abf(x)dx=∫abf∗(x)dx.

 

No comments:

Post a Comment

Popular Posts