Let be a topological space. We could view the lattice of open sets as a category.
i.e. , . This category is isomorphic to the category whose objects are open sets again and is the inclusion map .
It is easy to see this forms a category, and is the initial object, is the final object. For , their product is and their coproduct is .
Definition. Let be a category, then the category of -valued presheaves is defined by the functor category:
Hence a -valued presheaf on is just a functor from to . For two -valued presheaves over , , a morphism between them is a natural transformation. i.e.
For a presheaf over , we usually use the notation for the image of the morphism and call the restriction map from to . The elements in are called sections, and for , we use the notation to refer to .
Sheaf and Ringed Space
Definition. A sheaf is a presheaf that requires the following property.
Let be an open set of , and for any open covering , and a family ,
such that such that for all . Here means exists uniquely.
Equivalently, we can break it into two conditions.
Let be an open set in and an open covering .
For , .
For a family , if , then there exists an such that .
The category of sheaves is the fully faithful subcategory of . Usually, we use to refer to the category of sheaves over .
If the category admits all limits, then we can use equalizer to define a sheaf as follows:
Proposition. Let be a -valued sheaf over , then .
Proof. Let be any open covering of , it is easy to see . Firstly, notice that ; otherwise, we do not have . Secondly, assume that is not isomorphic to . Consider an open covering such that , and let such that but . The sheaf axiom tells us that , which is a contradiction.
Corollary. For valued sheaves over , .
Proposition. Let be a -valued sheaf on . If , then . This is also true for arbitrary pairwise disjoint open sets. i.e. .
Proof. Define by . We need to prove that is bijective.
Injective: Let , then and .
Surjective: Since is an open covering of , for every , since . By the sheaf condition, there exists an .
Definition. Let be a topological space and be a -valued sheaf over . Then we call the structure sheaf over , and a ringed space.
Examples of Presheaves, Sheaves, and Ringed Spaces
Fix a topological space here.
Continuous Function Sheaf
Let be another topological space and define . This is a sheaf.
It is easy to see there exists a unique function glued from an open covering. To see that is continuous as well, consider:
This example is really important and we will use it later.
You can also consider these concepts in the category of smooth manifolds, . Consider the ring object in and for a smooth manifold. Then, the derivation is an endomorphism of the sheaf.
Constant Function Presheaf
Let be a set and let be the constant function over . This is not a sheaf in general since if , then for disjoint , we could have but we could not find a constant function on such that and . However, if is a singleton set, then we can construct a constant presheaf by for all open sets . It is easy to see that this is a sheaf as well. This is the final object in . If you let be the zero ring, then is a ringed space. Also, for , a constant function presheaf is a sheaf if and only if is irreducible.
Locally Constant Function Sheaf
Let be a discrete space, then the sheaf of continuous functions from to is just the sheaf of locally constant functions.
Regular Function Sheaf on Affine Variety
Let be an affine variety with the Zariski topology. Then define the ring of regular functions on as
Obviously, this is a sheaf and gives us a ringed space .
Presheaf of Modules
For each , assign an -module . Then define . This gives us an example of an -valued presheaf. This is not a sheaf in general. For example, consider with the discrete topology, then is an open covering. Then . Since and by the previous proposition.
Sheaf of Modules
For each , assign an -module . Then define . This gives us an example of an -valued sheaf. For any open set and any open covering , if , then there exists a unique such that .
An interesting application of sheaf: Sequence in analysis as a Ring-Valued Sheaf
This also works if we replace the -module with any set . For example, let with the discrete topology again, and let for a function from to . But this is just a particular case of a continuous function sheaf. Notice that the functions are just . That is another example of a ring-valued sheaf in calculus. The subsequence is just a restriction of a section.
Here is not a Noetherian ring in general. If is infinite, then denote .
Then we have the ascending chain
and it will not stop since is infinite.
But if is finite, then the set of ideals of is finite, hence is a Noetherian ring. Thus, we conclude that is a Noetherian ring if and only if is finite.
But only considering is not exciting enough. In mathematical analysis, we always care about whether is convergent or not. Now let us find a good language to rewrite the convergence property.
Let and define the topology on as follows.
Let be a subset , is open if or and , where is any finite subset of .
Let us check if this defines a topology on .
Firstly, is open since it is a subset of and is open as well since it is and is a finite subset of .
For an arbitrary union of open sets, notice that it is a union of two parts: a family of and a family of .
i.e., we can have the following decomposition for an arbitrary union:
The is still a subset of and . Notice that the arbitrary intersection of finite sets is still a finite set. Hence for .
It is easy to see that for a finite subset of . Hence it is closed for arbitrary unions.
For the finite intersection, consider
Here .
If , the result is a subset of , hence open. If , then . Hence it is open as well since the finite union of finite sets is still finite. Hence it does form a topology on , denoted as .
Proposition. is compact.
Proof. Let be an open covering, then there exists a for some finite subset of . Hence we only need to pick some that could cover . Hence we get a finite subcovering of .
Now let us consider the continuous functions from to .
Proposition. is continuous if and only if .
Proof.
Only if: Suppose is continuous, then for any , there exists an open neighborhood of such that for all . But the open neighborhood of must have the form . Let , then , . Hence it converges to .
If: We only need to prove is convergent at , since at other points it is continuous automatically (discrete topology).
Assume converges to . Let be an open neighborhood of . Then there exists an such that . Hence , where is the subset of such that but . Hence converges to implies is continuous at . Hence is continuous.
Therefore, the ring of continuous functions from to is just the ring of convergent functions.
This ringed space is important in the study of analysis. We will return to this example after we discuss more about sheaves, such as stalks and locally ringed spaces...
No comments:
Post a Comment