Consider a simply connected domain and with a function holomorphic in .
Firstly, notice that integration is a group homomorphism:
This is well-defined since integration is invariant under path homotopy.
Remark. is a closed form by Cauchy-Riemann Condition, hence for
This is a group homomorphism because:
Note that is homotopy equivalent to 。
Here is a picture drawn by Magritte, in the case .

and the fundamental group of is , where is the free group functor .
Notice that the codomain of is , whcih is a abelian group, hence it uniquely pass through its abelianization via and unique determined a such that
Notice that the abelianization functor compose with fundamental group functor is
So indeed, what we get is .
Hence The Abelianization morphism:
can be written as:
where denotes the winding number of path around and , where is the loop around , whcih is the generator of .
Remark. The , or maybe we should write as is a bilinear form .
Now let's analyze this group homomorphism:
We know that for , it is equivalent selecting elements (possibly with repetition) from .
For elements , we can define a homomorphism through:
Conversely, defining a homomorphism by assigning gives us elements (possibly with repetition) from , which is essentially a linear function...
Therefore, any can be written as .
Looking back at this part:
we know it can be decomposed into expressions of the form:
Define the residue as:
The reason that I do not define as is to agree with the classical residue definition.
The classical residue definition states that there exists a unique where has an analytic antiderivative in , hence:
While there are many ways to calculate , that's not important here. What's significant is that:
No comments:
Post a Comment