Blog Archive

Thursday, April 4, 2024

Why det is a natural transformation?

The aim of this blog is proide a categorical approach to Mn(−),U,GLn,det⁡(−).

Let R be a ring, Mn(R) means the n×n matrix ring over R, U(R) means the unit group of R.

Lemma. Mn,U,GLn are functors.

It is not hard to see that Mn(−):Ring→Ring​.

For object

(R,+,⋅)↦(Mn(R),+,∘)

For morphism

(f:R→S)⟼(MN(f):Mn(R)→Mn(S))

For each element

Mn(f):(ri,j)↦(f(ri,j))

The unit group functor U(−):Ring→Grp maps R to its unit group, and naturally ring homomorphism becomes group homomorphism.

Then GLn(−):=U∘Mn(−).

Proposition. det⁡(−) is a natural transformation between GLn(−) and U(−).

Proof.

We already discuss the definition and property of det⁡(−) over R in here via the exterior power functor ⋀Rn(−).

By the functorial property of ⋀Rn(−), we see that for each R,

det⁡(AB)=det⁡(A)det⁡B,det⁡(A)∈U(R)⟺A∈GLn(R).

Hence detR:GLn(R)→U(R) gives us a family of group homomorphism.

Then the proposition is claimed by U(f)(detR⁡A))=detS⁡(GLn(f)(A)). For any ring homomorphism f:R→S.

You should draw the square by you own, and see the diagram commute is equivalent to

U(f)(detR⁡A))=detS⁡(GLn(f)(A))

The equation holds since f is a ring homomorphism. ◻

No comments:

Post a Comment

Popular Posts